AVDIO REVIJE

[Marko Puš]

Že pred desetimi leti mi je Paul govoril, da bo imel svojo hi-fi revijo. No, kaže, da mu je končno uspelo uresničiti svoje življenjske sanje...Veseli me, da je Martin tudi zraven.

[fotr]

BTW ali je kdo od vas že naročil revijo? Cena je kar zajetna, 65 funtov.

[kuzma2]

Ne še, toda je brez reklam.

[kuzma2]

Današnja priloga DELA- Vikend ima članek o najdražjih HIFI aparaturah.

[peter]

Včeraj je prispela omenjena revija v moj poštni predal.
Prvi vtis o reviji je dober.

Peter

[fotr]

Kaj je prvi vtis, ali da ne pušča barve in so slike vsaj kolikor toliko vidne, ali, da je vsebina OK, oziroma dobra?
Napiši kaj kakšen je kaj stil pisanja. Poljuden, razumljiv ali zapleten in morda tudi težej razumljiv povprečnemu znanju angleščine.
Hvala vnaprej

[Marko Puš]

[quote="administrator"]V Vel. Britaniji je izšla prva avdio številka novega dvomesečnika HIFI CRITIC, ki naj bi bila brez reklam:

[url]http://www.hificritic.com/[/url]

[Marko Puš]

Takšen pa je izgled...

[Marko Puš]

Takole...

[kuzma2]

Uvodnik v zadnji št. revije HIFI +:

This Months Editorial (Issue 50, March 2007)

It always amazes me that something as pivotal to hi-fi culture as the product review can be so widely (and wantonly) misunderstood. Manufacturers want their products to receive good reviews, readers only seem interested in reading good reviews (apart from the passing distraction of a little bloodletting as some poor unfortunate is ritually slaughtered). Yet no one seems to stop and consider just what constitutes a “good” review. Instead, the natural assumption seems to be that anything that doesn’t embrace the phrases “redefines the state of the art”, “it scored 140 on my normal 100 point scale” or “sell your Granny to buy one” is not a “good” review. The problem is that too much audio journalism consists of the same old tired clichés and hyperbole. Which might sound hypocritical coming from someone who gushed all over a pair of £60K speakers an issue or so ago. But my defence lies in the definition of the term “good”. You see, I don’t translate it as “uncritical” or “intemperately enthusiastic”. If forced to define the term in the context of audio reviews I think I’d choose “useful”. I think reviews should explain what a product does, how it does it and just as importantly, what it doesn’t do. It’s not enough to simply say a product sounds great. Describe why it sounds great and what effect it has on your musical reproduction and you are starting to get somewhere. Discuss the sort of space, care or system the product demands to work at its best and you are really making ground. Get as far as what job the product does and who it’s going to do it for and that’s pay-dirt. And that’s because all that information is actually useful when it comes to appreciating the product and deciding whether or not you should short list it for audition. It’s also useful to manufacturers and dealers, because it delivers feedback on the product, places it in context and (hopefully) acts as a first pass filter on potential customers. Very occasionally, you can even extrapolate general conclusions about audio as whole – which is where £60K speakers come in. Now that’s a good review!

A few years back someone said to me, “You know, the problem with your reviews is that they just aren’t quotable!” It remains one of my proudest moments. There are no simple answers or silver bullets in hi-fi. If we pretend there are then we are being fools to ourselves.



Roy Gregory
Editor hi-fi+ magazine

PS:
Še bolj pa je zanimiv njegov članek o tem , zakaj je boljše če imajo revije ali web strani reklame v primerjavi s tistimi, ki se hvalijo, da jih nimajo in naj bi bili njihovi testi objektivnejši. Enostaven odgovor- če so reklame, se ve kdo plača in ena reklama zajema mogoče le 1-2 % celotnega zneska. Pri tistih, kjer ni reklam, pa ne veš kdo stoji zadaj.

[fotr]

Saj ne paše sem, ampak danes je v prilogi dela, imenovani Kult, prijeten članek o HiFiju izpod tipkovnice Andreja Krbavčiča.
To je tisti gospod, ki je menda od Igorja kupil Atmasphere špa še kaj, na klub pa se je tu pa tam pripeljal s testnim hibridom toyote.
Sicer je gospod vrhunski strokovnjak za stara vozila
Lep vikend

[kuzma2]

Delo -str 24: Nisem siguren ali opisuje audiomane ali audioholike.

[fotr]

če zgornje vprašanje ni enostavno odgovorljivo, je pa gotovo, da so zajeti trgofili .

[Marko Puš]

[quote="Marko Puš"]Takole...

[Marko Puš]

V tretji številki HIFI CRITIC so zelo zanimivi članki o dinamični impotentnosti modernih posnetkov popularne glasbe, pa o tem, kako se v modernem času "delajo" posnetki "živh koncertov", vedno več je pronicljivih glasbenih kritik, podrobno je obdelana BBC-jeva zvočniška ikona in nekateri njeni nasledniki, objavljen pa je tudi tretji del Collomsove "sage" o kablih - tokrat so na vrsti povezovalni. Objavljeno je tudi zanimivo pismo bralca s konkretnimi predlogi in tako je revija (s testi, ki jih nisem omenil) več kot dobrodošla popestritev v trenutni ponudbi tovrstnih tiskovin.