Bh vs bh:
tukaj sedaj lahko nadaljujemo PINK PONK komentarje
Od mnenj resnih avdio revij pridemo do manj resnih revij, nato do forumskih revij in posameznih novinarjev, ko tega zmanjka pa za?nemo citirati pisma bralcev iz interneta, ki naj bi podkrepili tisto, kar razmišlja in piše "bh". Vsak si iš?e svoj nivo, ni kaj!
Piscu pisma ( Robert Lighton), je odgovoril DO(je bil pisec v reviji Stereophile že v za?etku osemdestih let) , ki se vsaj 30 let resno ukvarja z avdio problematiko:
CITAT:
"Hi Robert,
A little voice inside my head keeps insisting that you're pulling my leg. After all, when you refer to the Kuzma reference table as absolutely dead sounding, that in my book is as high a complement as one can pay a turntable. What that means is that it isn't being excited by environmental vibrations, that it is isolating the cartridge from mechanical vibration in the motor assembly, and that the platter is sinking energy punched into the vinyl by the cartridge. In other words: it is doing its job! In my sphere of experience, an acoustically dead turntable is a beautiful turntable.
Apparently you are compensating for poor cartridge/arm sonic performance by feeding resonant energy back into the signal. This highlights the practice, so common in audiophile review magazines, of shooting down a component because it doesn't neatly fit into one's system.
Obviously the Kuzma didn't work for you, but please don't shoot the messenger.
Enjoy the music,
Dick Olsher
Senior Editor"
Vem, da ve?ini angleš?ina pri razumevanju teksta ne bo delala preglavic!
saf.si
Slovenski avdiofilski forum